
The conversation around cloud migration has changed. It’s no longer about whether to move to the cloud, but when and how to do it right. Yet many firms receive conflicting information about what’s actually possible with their templates. This guide helps you separate fact from fiction and make informed decisions about your cloud migration.
Two years ago, the answer was simple: cloud meant stock templates only. No customizations. Take it or leave it.
That’s changed.
Jordan Moore, Co-Director of Template Consulting, explains: “The cloud platform has evolved significantly to support customizations based on client feedback. What wasn’t possible before is now achievable with the right approach.”
But here’s the challenge many teams face. This information hasn’t always reached everyone, so you might still run into outdated ideas about what’s possible.
Pette Chappell, Co-Director of Template Consulting, sees this frequently: “Sometimes initial assessments are conservative. When we dig deeper into specific requirements, we often find creative solutions that work within the platform’s capabilities.”
This happens because:
Here’s a concrete example of the confusion. Law firms often use SQL queries in templates to pull data not otherwise easily accessible.
Jordan Moore explains: “You used to be able to put an SQL call in a template to go pull data from somewhere. Well, in the cloud, you can’t do that.”
Sounds like functionality is lost, right? Not quite. You just need a different approach:
The key insight from Pette: “There’s nothing that we haven’t been able to do.” It might require creativity, but the functionality can be preserved.
Vendors often work with specific project windows and resource availability:
Pette Chappell observes this pattern: “They’re forced into tight timelines. Like if you don’t do this now, well, you’re not doing it for another year.”
The key is balancing vendor timelines with your firm’s readiness.
Law firms can’t migrate just any time. Jordan Moore identifies the reality: “There’s usually only like two or three times throughout the year where they can dedicate the time and resources.”
Common windows:
Planning around your schedule, not your vendor’s, leads to better outcomes.
Based on actual implementations, here’s what’s true:
You CAN have:
You CAN’T have:
You’ll need to adapt:
When evaluating capabilities, get specific:
Pette Chappell shares how collaboration works best: “Clients often come to us for a second opinion on complex requirements. By working together, we can usually find a path forward that meets everyone’s needs.”
Resist timeline pressure by:
Jordan Moore has seen the challenges of rushed timelines: “They’re trying to do a year’s worth of work in six or eight months, and there’s a lot of pressure and things fall through the cracks.”
Before migrating:
Cloud migration often opens doors to improvements. Jordan Moore recently confirmed: “Rocket is cloud-ready, and our BI offering is also going to be available in the 3E cloud.”
Consider addressing:
Key Questions to Ask:
Documentation Best Practices:
Cloud migration is inevitable for most firms, but you have more control than vendors might suggest. The technology has evolved significantly to handle most requirements.
Law firms often take a measured approach to new technology, and that’s perfectly reasonable. Taking time to get accurate information and make the right decision for your firm is the smart approach.
The key is knowing the difference between vendor pressure and genuine readiness. Move when it makes sense for your firm, with full knowledge of what’s actually possible.
Datolite’s Template Services team helps law firms make informed decisions about cloud migration, ensuring your customizations and workflows transfer successfully.
Learn how we can help you:
Ready to get clear answers about your cloud migration options?
Jordan Moore and Pette Chappell are the Co-Directors of Template Consulting at Datolite Solutions.
Together, they lead a team that helps law firms update their billing templates, move systems to the cloud, and solve technical challenges.
With decades of combined experience working with Elite 3E Templates and Aderant’s DocuDraft systems, they focus on finding practical solutions that keep existing features working while adopting new technology.
Jordan and Pette are known for tackling complex problems others say can’t be solved, helping firms get the most from their template systems during major transitions.